(read, react, vote)

-Mark Noble

…XX concluded that XXXX’s 2005 death was an accident; the X XXXX district attorney declined to prosecute XX and XXX because X’s autopsy had, as an assistant district attorney wrote to the XXXX police department in a 2008 letter, “effectively exonerated” them. But Dr. XXXX X, a forensic pathologist hired by X’s family, found 23 injuries XXX had missed and determined the fatal laceration of X’s organ was caused by a beating… investigation, conducted in partnership with XXX “XXX” and XXXX, found that XX had made a series of autopsy errors and (undeserving of municipal faith) oversights that had cleared police officers of wrongdoing. In each case, the families of the deceased hired an expert to conduct a second autopsy that found the death to be a homicide. ¹

1 Thank you http://www.propublica.org


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s